I have found Fireside Politics much more helpful than by last reading. Although I have yet to finish it, it has provided me with much insight into how radio stations were setup and the differing ideas on regulating them. I was not surprised to learn of the opposition to any plan that involved government ownership of stations. As with so many things, England, Canada, and Australia had some type of system where the government owned at least some of the stations. However, in sticking with the iconic American idea of keeping government and business separate, there was little support for a similar system of regulation here.
One thing that did surprise me was the voluntary censorship the stations adopted during the early years of FDR’s presidency. All the Federal Radio Commission had to do was imply that any station that that broadcast ideas that opposed Roosevelt’s policies would face the possibility of their license being renewed and that was the end of it. An industry dominated with Republicans gave FDR unrestricted access to their airwaves and refused to air opposing viewpoints. In my option, this is an example of a great failure in journalism. According to Craig, many newspapers published editorials openly disagreeing with FDR’s policies. But the threat of being denied a license renewal was enough to prevent radio stations from doing the same.
I have started to read about the formation of the FCC and hope that its replacement of the FRC will alleviate some of the politics of keeping a radio license.
I plan to continue reading Fireside Politics and possibly begin Communities of the Air this week.